Roman wolf and Chinese dragon. Chinese delegation to August?
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
Humanity is a unique community tightly connected to each other not only genetically and biologically, but also by cause and effect and other historical laws. Accordingly, its cultural phenomena are only subsets of a single whole, so it is wrong to approach the study of certain general cultural phenomena by isolating them from the influence of interdependence with other phenomena, products of human general cultural development, even if they are spatially extremely distant. In the context of the aforementioned, or rather in confirmation of the aforementioned views, it is interesting to observe the knowledge of each other, the contacts and relationships that two political units had during a centuries-long period of ancient history that shaped and symbolized a certain civilizational development at the extreme points of the Eurasian space in the period of the last centuries of the old era and the first centuries of the new era.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
- Buchan, J. 1969., Imperator Avgust, izd. Minerva, Subotica-Beograd 1969.
- Budimir, M. I Flašar, M. 1963., Pregled rimske književnosti, De auctoribus romanis, Beograd 1963.
- Musić, A. 1900., Povjest grčke književnosti, dio II, povjest grčke proze u klasično vrijeme i povjest grčke književnosti u poklasično vrijeme, Zagreb 1900.
- Smith, W. 1870., Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities, Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
- Yule, H. 1866., Cathay and the Way Thither: vol.l, London 1866.